NEW SGEM Scientific Online eLibrary
After a long time work, our pride is the absolutely new SGEM Online eLibrary, available here. The Library is created according the rules of the International databases, with a whole needed information and ability to export the article in BIB format. Try and spread your experience with us.
Till we complete the new library with papers from all the years, you can use this link /Full Old Library/, if papers that you need are not visible yet here.

LEGACY OR FALLACY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THE OLYMPIC GAMES

Dendura, B.
Abstract:
Each of the national committees organising the Games is required to provide stadiums and related infrastructure capable to accommodate hundreds of thousands of spectators within a short, 40-day period of time in order to carry out the Olympic Game. At the same time, the International Olympic Committee calls for providing a complete buildings that are sustainable, energy-saving, with the use of energy from renewable sources (ie. solar-, wind-, geothermal energy, etc), building skins designed to eliminate thermal loss, and with its impact on the natural environment brought to absolute minimum. These two requirements seem to be impossible to combine. The following article reviews the original project brief and the results of completed investment of the four recent Games (London 2012, Sochi 2014, Rio de Janeiro 2016 and Pyeongchang 2018), all based on the official reports provided by the organisers, scientific research and satellite photos that allow to assess the extent of the investment’s impact on the environment. This analysis also describes to what extent the ideas of sustainable design have been implemented for Olympic investments and what measures were taken to ensure that these facilities will find future use after the Games are over. The scale of the Olympic Games makes it impossible to organise them in the manner that is neutral to the environment, for the transport of the participants and spectators to the location of the Games itself has already a huge impact on the environment, not mentioning the construction process. Every more often however, the organisers decide to use temporary building structures or structures that can be later easily rebuild and converted in terms of function and scale to suit local communities. This process may improve a bit perceived image of the modern Olympic movement, which is very often associated with billions spent on ‘white elephant’ investments and a lost opportunity for sustainable development in the area. This text may become one of the information sources for the potential or future Olympic Games’ organisers – the Olympic movement, whose future seems to be however unthreatened.
SGEM Research areas:
Year:
2018
Type of Publication:
In Proceedings
Keywords:
Architecture; Olympics; Environment; Impact; Legacy
Volume:
18
SGEM Book title:
18th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2018
Book number:
6.4
SGEM Series:
International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference-SGEM
Pages:
765-776
Publisher address:
51 Alexander Malinov blvd, Sofia, 1712, Bulgaria
SGEM supporters:
Bulgarian Acad Sci; Acad Sci Czech Republ; Latvian Acad Sci; Polish Acad Sci; Russian Acad Sci; Serbian Acad Sci & Arts; Slovak Acad Sci; Natl Acad Sci Ukraine; Natl Acad Sci Armenia; Sci Council Japan; World Acad Sci; European Acad Sci, Arts & Letters; Ac
Period:
3 – 6 December, 2018
ISBN:
978-619-7408-71-3
ISSN:
1314-2704
Conference:
18th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2018, 3 – 6 December, 2018
DOI:
10.5593/sgem2018V/6.4/S10.095
Hits: 64
/** LightBox **/ /** END LightBox **/ /** SweetAlert **/ /** **/ /** SweetAlert2 **/ /** END SweetAlert2 **/